The Dry River


Downfall of Mankind

Nancy Grace

Who the hell is this lady? I use the term ‘lady’ fairly loosely here. I have been reviewing the comments on her videos and her website, watching a few opinions of her (my favorite), and watching her show (I got sick, twice). This is when I realized why people watch her, they hate her. That made sense, until I came across the comments by viewers about how “highly intelligent” she is, and why “the whole world should love her too.” That blew my mind, but at the same time earned her a place in this blog.

So Nancy Grace is intelligent? Judging by the lack of reference to her career – opinion solely formed based on her show – makes the definition of intelligence “loud, annoying, biased, and rich.” I’m sure there are several other, more colorful, words to describe her form of “intelligence,” but I like to keep this blog somewhat PG-rated. On the second note, I do think the whole world should see her show. It might slap the American public into realizing how retarded the news industry has become.

The show that has prompted my blog entry is the story of the dog getting denied access to help the autistic boy at a public school. According to Nancy, “That’s BS,” while according to the state laws, the dog is not a “legal and specialized animal for treatment.” While I agree with the fact that the dog helps the boy, the school has rules to follow. They let the dog in and some other mom goes to Grace about the “vicious and presumed rabid animal attacking the school.” During the “dog show” Nancy justified her opinion – yes, opinion (look it up Grace, you’re not a news reporter)) – by asking three “experts”: the mother of the boy (official expert on the boy), an autism advocate (expert of nothing but PR), and a five second clip from the only real expert, who was obviously more biased than Grace. This dog in question has to pass/be trained by an official organization, approved by the medical industry and state laws. It wasn’t. This dog couldn’t sit still for a 5 min interview; imagine how distracting it would be in a room of 10 year old kids. No offense to the family in question, but if the boy needs a dog to remain calm and orderly, maybe it shouldn’t be in the public school (or maybe a squirrel would work out better). I have to back the Hillsboro district on this one, stand your ground. Grace might be a dog herself, but she has no bite and deserves a good mussel. She is a ratings hog, find a topic, blow it way out of proportion, and report it with your own super-twist and video effects. She could turn a story about flies into a national epidemic, and the lower half of the IQ ladder would jump out of a window on her advice. I agree, jump.

Experiment: Let Nancy write her own constitution. It would read in a by-person layout. “Sue Smith can do this, but not that, and not that. But she can do this.” If anything she’d feel like a contributor and it would occupy her time for the next million years. Nancy, we have laws in this country, you so-calledly know them, you can’t agree with your stories if you know the law. What is Hillsboro supposed to say? Yes to this dog, then what? I need my dog so I can read; you can’t prove I don’t, so therefore I get mine too. Laws aren’t perfect, but it beats that system.

To sign off in the official Nancy Grace way, current member of Dickipeidia (I love that), most biased “news” reporter in the world, anything-for-a-paycheck advocate, and award winner for “most interrupting person”: “F you! I’m Nancy Grace! I have a TV show!”

Note to Grace: I’ll do an interview, but my half is going to YouTube where you can’t disrupt it. But, that kind of eliminates the point, doesn’t it?

Share This Post
  • email
  • Digg
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Sphinn
  • Print
Related Websites January 18th, 2010
Topic: All, General, TV Tags: , , , , , , ,

One Response to “Nancy Grace”

  1. admin Says:

    Oh yeah, your post made its way on to a Nancy Grace fan site. Ha!

≡ Leave a Reply